Hazem Naow vs George Houghton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Houghton analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs George Houghton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naow 2 - 0 Houghton
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 48.86% of points on their second serve, while Houghton has won 47.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Houghton has won 50.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.77% and 32.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 62.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Houghton has saved 55.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 68.29% of matches played (W/L 56/ 26), with Houghton winning 52.17% (W/L 24/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 39). Houghton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 35/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 38/ 14), where as Houghton has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Naow winning 2 times and Houghton being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Naow winning 4 and Houghton winning 0. The last match between Naow and Houghton was at the M15 Madrid, 01-12-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Houghton have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Houghton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 0, and Houghton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.13 while Houghton has played against players with an average rank of 128.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Houghton has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 43.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Houghton has converted 41.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Hazem Naow
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
343
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
George Houghton
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
65% (152-81)
Career Total W/L
54% (77-66)
71% (27-11)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Hazem Naow | George Houghton |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 0:26:0 | 0:26:0 |
1st Serve % | 72% (26/36) | 39% (14/36) |
1st Serve Win% | 92% (24/26) | 57% (8/14) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (4/10) | 23% (5/22) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 64% (23/36) | 22% (8/36) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
George Houghton
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
39%
(
14 of
36)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
6-4 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hazem Naow | George Houghton |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 71% (27/11) | 52% (11/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 66% (56/29) | 52% (25/23) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (433/350) | 52% (244/228) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (19/6) | 40% (4/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.42 |
Aces Total | 78 | 96 |
DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 137 | 46 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:10 | 1:34:41 |
Avg Opp Rank | 255.76 | 155.14 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1634/2598) | 61% (771/1268) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (1126/1634) | 73% (563/771) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (471/964) | 47% (235/497) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (130/300) | 41% (56/136) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (1096/2554) | 39% (537/1366) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 68% (15/7) | 0% (0/2) |
Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 58% (11/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (27/38) | 52% (11/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 20% (1/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 91% (11/10) |
1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 9% (11/1) |
1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 10% (10/1) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Lucas Gerch
Player
Hazem Naow
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
George Houghton Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Toby Martin
Player
George Houghton
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
George Houghton
Player
David Quayle
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
George Houghton
Player
Hamish Stewart
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
George Houghton
Player
Liam Delicata
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
George Houghton
Player
Jack Gibbens
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
82%
(
61 of
74)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Koray Kirci
Player
George Houghton
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
47%
(
46 of
98)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
George Houghton
Player
Tamas Belafalvi-Balint
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
3%
(
1 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
George Houghton
Player
Joe Tyler
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more